Reminder: Martineau does NOT Support Initiative and Referendum, Consolidating City Services

At the League of Women Voter’s forum Thursday night the candidates were asked two yes or no questions: Do you support initiative and referendum? and Do you support consolidating city services into city property? Ms. Martineau raised her hand ‘yes’ for both. Despite that, you can see that Nicole Martineau does NOT support popular citizen topics of initiative and referendum or consolidating city services into city property.

This is clearly evidenced by her vote on both issues recently. Directly from the minutes of the November 9, 2010 council meeting, less than a year ago:

Council Action:

A motion was made by Councilmember Hansen, second by Councilmember Knutsen, to approve the resolution providing for the powers of initiative and referendum. The motion failed 2-5 (Boyle, Brouillet, Martineau, Malloy, Turner).”

Here is the vote from the September 7, 2010 council meeting, where she voted no into even studying whether or not moving the court from its current leased space into city property would save the city money.

“Council Action:

A motion was made by Councilmember Hansen, second by Councilmember Boyle, to bring back an item asking the city manager to direct staff to study the costs to move the court system into City Hall, with the review of the fifth floor as the location site, on the next council agenda for council consideration.

The motion passed with a roll call vote 4-3 (Martineau, Brouillet, Turner).”

You can’t hide from the vote.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Election 2011, Nicole Martineau

2 responses to “Reminder: Martineau does NOT Support Initiative and Referendum, Consolidating City Services

  1. Robert Lord

    Ms. Martineau is the worst kind of politician. An opportunistic individual who says whatever she thinks will get her elected and then panders to the whims of her mentor, Kathy Turner. A citizens’ nightmare.

    The public record bears witness to her betrayal of the citizens she allegedly represents. Her most recent ploy demonstrated that she is not to be trusted. The public of council meeting votes reveals that she voted against “the right to initiative and referendum” for citizens yet recently at a candidate election forum she indicated that she supported “initiative and referendum” for citizens. Then last night at the Oct 18, 2011 council meeting she rebuffed councilman Rick Hansen’s offer to support her in revisiting the issue of the right of “Initiative and referendum” for citizens that she voted against earlier in the year.

    Not some one to be trusted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s